WE NEED THE BEST METERING SYSTEM OF THE MARKET

[marQs]

... RME Digicheck, if you use RME hardware...

[mimidhof1]

I hope that UA Engineers gad more futurist projection than what I've read here and that they will developed both: more vintage Gears and also new and futurist tools, if not they are already condamned to disapear like Vintage brand. You can not just look for future product in the past.... this is not serious.
They are at the top of today DSP programs developement. Why would they just look back in the past. Future is Open for creativity....
Please don't be so close, it's just a debate in a forum place, and tell me what could be created in future DSP supported features : just compressors, Limiters, console track simulations, reverb, delay, chorus....and that's it.......comon....doods.....
Let me have some more expectations....

[mpayne0]

I hope that UA Engineers gad more futurist projection than what I've read here and that they will developed both: more vintage Gears and also new and futurist tools, if not they are already condamned to disapear like Vintage brand. You can not just look for future product in the past.... this is not serious.
They are at the top of today DSP programs developement. Why would they just look back in the past. Future is Open for creativity....
Please don't be so close, it's just a debate in a forum place, and tell me what could be created in future DSP supported features : just compressors, Limiters, console track simulations, reverb, delay, chorus....and that's it.......comon....doods.....
Let me have some more expectations....

I guess most would prefer UAD stick to their excellent 'signal' processing. Metering doesn't take advantage of much of what UAD do best.

Look at voxengo, izotope, blue cat. There are some wonderful metering solutions out there, from companies that have been doing it for years.
Why not let UAD continue to do what they do best? I'm sure there will be something for everyone in the future.

[mimidhof1]

Ok, But don't you all think that UA have the " P O T E N T I A L " to make us the BEST TOOLS for OUR MIXES & MASTERS.
ARE SOME PEOPLE AFRAID TO NEED TO BUY A SECOND OR A THIRD DSP CARD TO FINALY HAVE THE BEST, MOST ACCURATE, USEFULL, CLEAREST DAW SOUND CONTROL SYSTEM...

[Hell Yeh]

Ok, But don't you all think that UA have the " P O T E N T I A L " to make us the BEST TOOLS for OUR MIXES & MASTERS.
ARE SOME PEOPLE AFRAID TO NEED TO BUY A SECOND OR A THIRD DSP CARD TO FINALY HAVE THE BEST, MOST ACCURATE, USEFULL, CLEAREST DAW SOUND CONTROL SYSTEM...

WOULD YOU BUY ANOTHER DSP CARD FOR THE MOST ACCURATE, USEFUL, AND CLEAREST SOUNDING DAW MUTE BUTTONS? I WOULD!

[bysbox001]

Ok, But don't you all think that UA have the " P O T E N T I A L " to make us the BEST TOOLS for OUR MIXES & MASTERS.
ARE SOME PEOPLE AFRAID TO NEED TO BUY A SECOND OR A THIRD DSP CARD TO FINALY HAVE THE BEST, MOST ACCURATE, USEFULL, CLEAREST DAW SOUND CONTROL SYSTEM...

WOULD YOU BUY ANOTHER DSP CARD FOR THE MOST ACCURATE, USEFUL, AND CLEAREST SOUNDING DAW MUTE BUTTONS? I WOULD!

LMFAO!

[mpayne0]

Ok, But don't you all think that UA have the " P O T E N T I A L " to make us the BEST TOOLS for OUR MIXES & MASTERS.
ARE SOME PEOPLE AFRAID TO NEED TO BUY A SECOND OR A THIRD DSP CARD TO FINALY HAVE THE BEST, MOST ACCURATE, USEFULL, CLEAREST DAW SOUND CONTROL SYSTEM...

No.

It's good to spread it around.

What happens when your pci cards fry (* forbid)... your screwed.
I prefer a market where vendors provide within their niche, improve what they specialize in. Not try to be jack of all trades.
I don't need signal processing pros to make me a gui to show level and frequency balance.

Sorry, I have given it thought, but cannot think of ONE scenario where I MUST HAVE UAD make the analyzer, as opposed to someone else.

[mimidhof1]

Don't you know what...?

[mimidhof1]

There is no better component to control and analyse sounds than a dedicate DSP Card and if you trust in UA brand to make so precise reproduction of analog gear you can not be so blind and deaf about this subject.
There is a so specific relation between the hardware present in your UA Card and what would be needed to have the more accurate sound analyse system that I realy don't understand your position...
Money...? No price have been debated. Maybe not so expensive...

[MarkE]

Nobodies interested. Please let these two threads die.

[electro77]

How can you improve on sample accurate metering?

Why can't it be native?

[hugol]

There is no better component to control and analyse sounds than a dedicate DSP Card ...

That'll be due to all the DSP induced mathamagics, right?

[mimidhof1]

DSP means "DIGITAL "SOUND" PROCESSOR" = Processor specialised in sound/PHYSICAL calculation.
The DSP are now present, in various versions, in most of the music industry equipments...
The high quality of the UA product is surely the reference in signal treatment and calculation
They are obviously the best in signal calculation system...
Calculations, emulations, treatment, analysis, synthesis,...
It still a lot of DSP posibilities...
The accuracy of their emulation is common knowledge...
I don't have any Steinberg hardware, in all the cases I'm not sure that they could make as good equipment as UA...
For the expirience they have on this sector...

[fistula]

DSP means "DIGITAL "SOUND" PROCESSOR" = Processor specialised in sound/PHYSICAL calculation.
The DSP are now present, in various versions, in most of the music industry equipments...
The high quality of the UA product is surely the reference in signal treatment and calculation
They are obviously the best in signal calculation system...
Calculations, emulations, treatment, analysis, synthesis,...
It still a lot of DSP posibilities...
The accuracy of their emulation is common knowledge...
I don't have any Steinberg hardware, in all the cases I'm not sure that they could make as good equipment as UA...
For the expirience they have on this sector...

DSP means Digital Signal Processor - it differs by its architecture from common (CISC) nowadays processors (intel and amd ones)- as its RISC architecture (as mac's PPC procs)
DSP are widely used to process stream data - from satellites, observatories scopes, airplanes sensors, etc... and the sound of course

and i think these 2 threads should die - coz they don't have any sense

[thethethediamondz]

but if Steinberg were to create for them a new system,
couldn't this same be applied to physics? if no, then think why.
see? this is what has not been realized in your fallaciy....
and i see this a very wrong argument for us.
all these meters..
some are good tools but hardly accumulate your senses of esteem
and dedication in hearing.
true, the uad quality is excelled by their own applications,
but why only professionaly cleared for this??
is this the only true
that is by " so called modern vision of daw modeling"?
...
but so one and so on, the companies will squabble and
then divise a new standard. how can they expect any plug inside UAD or emulation of this
be such a constant reminder of this?? when one is clearly unmatching in all manners and stable reference?
besides the small handful, this is useless.

so please just vote me for no.