oldoak2000 wrote:cgar wrote: . . . . . . DSP maybe be more efficient but that does not change the fact this this is all friggn' ones and zeros folks!
Well, if that's your argument, then just sell your pc and use a commodore 64 and a hex editor to MANUALLY edit your own effects, after all, it's just ones and zeros . . . . .![]()
Dude - you're a fool! UAD-1 and UAD-2 are a tool -nothing more. Sure, you could get the same 'work' done without the tool (given unlimited time), or even better with a 'different' tool if it existed - but it doesn't - so unless you can demonstrate a better way - SHUT UP! Even if you 'were' smart enough to write you own 'uad-clone' native plugs, by the time you finished, uad-3 would be out . . .
I didn't insult anyone here. If you're insist on being a douche, that's fine be one. Making a analogy with a commodore 64 really show's how enlightened your are. Good luck with all that brilliance.


